Skip to main content

Governance

Principles​

Emmet.Finance is committed to a decentralized governance model that ensures transparency, inclusivity, and accountability. Our governance principles are designed to empower the community, enabling stakeholders to actively participate in the decision-making process and influence the platform's development. Key principles include:

  • Decentralization: Decisions are made by the community of EMMET token holders, rather than a centralized authority. This ensures that the platform's direction aligns with the interests of its users.

  • Transparency: All governance activities, including proposals, discussions, and voting outcomes, are recorded on the blockchain and made publicly accessible. This openness fosters trust and accountability.

  • Inclusivity: All stakeholders, regardless of their holdings, have the opportunity to contribute to governance discussions and proposals. This inclusive approach ensures a diverse range of perspectives and ideas.

  • Security and Integrity: The governance framework is designed to protect against malicious activities and ensure the integrity of the decision-making process. This includes measures to prevent vote manipulation and safeguard community funds.

  • Sustainability: Governance decisions are made with the long-term sustainability of the platform in mind, ensuring that Emmet.Finance can adapt and thrive in a rapidly evolving DeFi landscape.

Process​

The governance process within Emmet.Finance involves several key stages, from proposal submission to implementation. The following steps outline how governance functions are carried out:

  1. Proposal Submission:

    1.1 Any EMMET token holder can submit a governance proposal. Proposals may cover a wide range of topics, including protocol upgrades, fee adjustments, new feature implementation, and treasury management.

    1.2 Proposals must include detailed information, such as the rationale, expected impact, and technical details. A minimum number of tokens may be required to submit a proposal to prevent spam.

  2. Discussion and Deliberation:

    2.1 Once submitted, proposals enter a discussion phase where the community can debate the merits and drawbacks. Discussions take place on official forums, social media, and other communication channels.

    2.2 This phase is crucial for gathering feedback, refining proposals, and ensuring all aspects are thoroughly considered. It also provides an opportunity for the proposal's author to address concerns and make adjustments.

  3. Voting:

    3.1 After the discussion phase, eligible proposals move to a voting phase. EMMET token holders can cast their votes based on their token holdings, with each token typically representing one vote.

    3.2 The voting period is predefined and lasts for a specified duration. A proposal passes if it meets the required quorum (a minimum number of votes) and achieves a majority approval.

    3.3 In certain cases, a supermajority (e.g., two-thirds approval) may be required, particularly for proposals with significant implications, such as changes to the governance structure or tokenomics.

  4. Implementation:

    4.1 Once a proposal is approved, it enters the implementation phase. The Emmet.Finance development team, or designated working groups, are responsible for executing the proposal as specified.

    4.2 Implementation includes deploying smart contract updates, integrating new features, or reallocating treasury funds. The process is closely monitored to ensure it adheres to the approved proposal's specifications.

  5. Post-Implementation Review:

    5.1 After implementation, the community reviews the outcome to assess the proposal's impact and effectiveness. This review helps identify any issues or areas for improvement, ensuring continuous optimization of the platform.

    5.2 Feedback from the post-implementation review is documented and may inform future proposals or adjustments to existing processes.

  6. Emergency Governance:

    6.1 In exceptional circumstances, such as critical security vulnerabilities or other urgent issues, an emergency governance process may be initiated. This process involves expedited discussions and voting to address the issue swiftly.

    6.2 The emergency governance mechanism includes safeguards to prevent abuse, such as requiring a higher quorum or supermajority approval.